Hi everybody,
I work with SQL Server 2000 SP2 in an Active/active Cluster.
Two days ago, one the sql server fulltext resource of one node just failed suddenly.
Now I am realizing that Search Engine Utility has not been used by any of my databases, so I would like do disable this service...
Does anybody know how can I get rid of the Microsoft Search Service.
I don't need this service active!
In Service Manager the Microsoft Search is in an unkown state.
In cluster Administrator the sql server full text resource is in a failed state.
Do I need to delete the full text resource or is there any other way to disable the Search Service?
Any help or advice will be very important to me...
Thanks,Search service is a shared service by all SQL Server instances.
Can you take off-line on SQL Server FullText resources from all SQL Server instances from cluster administrator?
You shouldn't remove the search service even though you currently do not use it. Try take it off-line.
Becuase your search service is in unknow status, I would move all cluster groups to the good node and restart the machine that search service is not function properly.|||Hi Allen_Cui
Thank you for your reply...
I have already tried to move all the groups to the good node and the result was:
Microsoft Search is in "stopped" state in Service Manager... -> that's ok!
SQL Server Full Text resource was in "failed" state in cluster Administrator... -> that's not ok!
But before I try the manual failover I selected the option "Do not restart" in the properties of the failed Full Text Resource...
My problem now is: I want to convert the state of the failed Full Text Resource to an offline state the is more pleasant to see...
Do you have any idea?
I will be waiting for your help...|||I would check the machine application/system logs to see any errors related FullText resource and search service.
Friday, March 30, 2012
How to direct T-SQL executoin output to a file
Is there a SQL Server 2000 equivalent of the Oracle SPOOL command like SPOOL 'C:\TEMP\MyFile.txt' which can be placed at the top of a series of SQL commands to direct the execution messages and results to the nominated file ? I want to use this in a Stored Procedure executed from within Access and capture all system and error messages at the server level.
|||hi,
open sql query analyzer
click on "query"
click on "results to file"
run a query.
or better yet
run BCPor the bulk copy program
regards,
joey
This will work if xp_cmdshell is enabled
DECLARE @.isqlString varchar(255)
SELECT @.isqlString = 'isql -Q "SELECT top 10 FROM TABLE" -E -o C:\Results.txt'
EXEC master..xp_cmdshell @.isqlString
|||Hi,
I found Steve's tip very helpful, however I also found out that you have to refer to the database name that the table belongs to even if the database you are refering to is the currently selected database within query analyser. This is because the command shell cannot see what the default database within query analyser is.
Please find the following example; -
declare @.str varchar(255)
select @.str = 'isql -Q"select * from spintlslive.dbo.T_Payments WHERE Paydate = ''07/13/2007''" -E -w255 -oD:\UPLOADS\payments.txt'
exec master..xp_cmdshell @.str
How to direct T-SQL executoin output to a file
Is there a SQL Server 2000 equivalent of the Oracle SPOOL command like SPOOL 'C:\TEMP\MyFile.txt' which can be placed at the top of a series of SQL commands to direct the execution messages and results to the nominated file ? I want to use this in a Stored Procedure executed from within Access and capture all system and error messages at the server level.
hi,
open sql query analyzer
click on "query"
click on "results to file"
run a query.
or better yet
run BCPor the bulk copy program
regards,
joey
|||
This will work if xp_cmdshell is enabled
DECLARE @.isqlString varchar(255)
SELECT @.isqlString = 'isql -Q "SELECT top 10 FROM TABLE" -E -o C:\Results.txt'
EXEC master..xp_cmdshell @.isqlString
|||Hi,
I found Steve's tip very helpful, however I also found out that you have to refer to the database name that the table belongs to even if the database you are refering to is the currently selected database within query analyser. This is because the command shell cannot see what the default database within query analyser is.
Please find the following example; -
declare @.str varchar(255)
select @.str = 'isql -Q"select * from spintlslive.dbo.T_Payments WHERE Paydate = ''07/13/2007''" -E -w255 -oD:\UPLOADS\payments.txt'
exec master..xp_cmdshell @.str
How to direct temp files for DTS packages
I have several DTS packages that import FoxPro data into SQL 2000. These
jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am importing.
I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then the
temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it leaves
the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
files.
Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
Thanks
MikeNevermind. I found it. It is a windows configuration setting.
"Mike" <Mike@.Comcast.net> wrote in message
news:u7yCs%235MEHA.3636@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have several DTS packages that import FoxPro data into SQL 2000. These
> jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am
importing.
> I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then
the
> temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it
leaves
> the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
> directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
> files.
> Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
> to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
> Thanks
> Mike
>
jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am importing.
I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then the
temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it leaves
the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
files.
Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
Thanks
MikeNevermind. I found it. It is a windows configuration setting.
"Mike" <Mike@.Comcast.net> wrote in message
news:u7yCs%235MEHA.3636@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have several DTS packages that import FoxPro data into SQL 2000. These
> jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am
importing.
> I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then
the
> temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it
leaves
> the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
> directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
> files.
> Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
> to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
> Thanks
> Mike
>
How to direct temp files for DTS packages
I have several DTS packages that import FoxPro data into SQL 2000. These
jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am importing.
I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then the
temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it leaves
the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
files.
Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
Thanks
MikeNevermind. I found it. It is a windows configuration setting.
"Mike" <Mike@.Comcast.net> wrote in message
news:u7yCs%235MEHA.3636@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have several DTS packages that import FoxPro data into SQL 2000. These
> jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am
importing.
> I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then
the
> temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it
leaves
> the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
> directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
> files.
> Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
> to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
> Thanks
> Mike
>sql
jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am importing.
I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then the
temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it leaves
the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
files.
Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
Thanks
MikeNevermind. I found it. It is a windows configuration setting.
"Mike" <Mike@.Comcast.net> wrote in message
news:u7yCs%235MEHA.3636@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have several DTS packages that import FoxPro data into SQL 2000. These
> jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am
importing.
> I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then
the
> temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it
leaves
> the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
> directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
> files.
> Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
> to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
> Thanks
> Mike
>sql
How to direct temp files for DTS packages
I have several DTS packages that import FoxPro data into SQL 2000. These
jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am importing.
I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then the
temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it leaves
the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
files.
Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
Thanks
Mike
Nevermind. I found it. It is a windows configuration setting.
"Mike" <Mike@.Comcast.net> wrote in message
news:u7yCs%235MEHA.3636@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have several DTS packages that import FoxPro data into SQL 2000. These
> jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am
importing.
> I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then
the
> temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it
leaves
> the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
> directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
> files.
> Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
> to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
> Thanks
> Mike
>
jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am importing.
I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then the
temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it leaves
the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
files.
Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
Thanks
Mike
Nevermind. I found it. It is a windows configuration setting.
"Mike" <Mike@.Comcast.net> wrote in message
news:u7yCs%235MEHA.3636@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> I have several DTS packages that import FoxPro data into SQL 2000. These
> jobs create a temp file about the same size of the data that I am
importing.
> I call the DTS packages as a SQL job. If the job runs successfully then
the
> temp files are removed when it finishes, however if the job fails it
leaves
> the file in the C:\Documents and Settings\SQLUser\Local Settings\Temp
> directory and I start to run low on disk space until I manually delete the
> files.
> Is there a way to direct where these files go? I would like to change this
> to the D:\ where I have a lot more space.
> Thanks
> Mike
>
How to diplay a dataset in a table
Hi all..
I have a dataset named "Primas" that returns 3 records with 3 fields each.
I want to display a list of those records with a header and a summarize row.
To do that, I placed a Table control into the layout. Assigned "Primas" as
the dataset and I placed a textbox control into it with the value of
=Fields!CODIGOPRIMA.value (CODIGOPRIMA belongs to Primas dataset)
When I build the report, I get the error:
"Expression value of object CODIGOPRIMA reference field CODIGOPRIMA. Report
element expressions can only reference a field in actual dataset scope or, if
they are inside an aggregate, the specified dataset scope"
(I translated the messaege from Spanish, so I'm not sure if it is accurate,
but that's the idea).
The question.. why I get that message although I have the dataset specified
for that table? When I go to a field property inside the table, under
expressions, system shows me only the fields from a dataset that is the
parent of the table (a List)
Any help will be greately appreciated,
Thanks
JaimeYou might check that the Dataset is aware of the field you are trying to
use. You can do this by clicking on the Refresh button on the Data tab with
that dataset selected. I get that same message if I've added or changed a
field in the underlying database and forget to refresh the dataset.
Jared
"Jaime Stuardo" <JaimeStuardo@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:8C285D68-701D-451F-A2A8-363B80874025@.microsoft.com...
> Hi all..
> I have a dataset named "Primas" that returns 3 records with 3 fields each.
> I want to display a list of those records with a header and a summarize
> row.
> To do that, I placed a Table control into the layout. Assigned "Primas" as
> the dataset and I placed a textbox control into it with the value of
> =Fields!CODIGOPRIMA.value (CODIGOPRIMA belongs to Primas dataset)
> When I build the report, I get the error:
> "Expression value of object CODIGOPRIMA reference field CODIGOPRIMA.
> Report
> element expressions can only reference a field in actual dataset scope or,
> if
> they are inside an aggregate, the specified dataset scope"
> (I translated the messaege from Spanish, so I'm not sure if it is
> accurate,
> but that's the idea).
> The question.. why I get that message although I have the dataset
> specified
> for that table? When I go to a field property inside the table, under
> expressions, system shows me only the fields from a dataset that is the
> parent of the table (a List)
> Any help will be greately appreciated,
> Thanks
> Jaime|||Hi Tom...
I have done so but the same problem happens. And when I go to the field
value combobox, only dataset fields associated with the List are shown, not
table daaset fields.
Jaime
"Tom Rocco" wrote:
> You might check that the Dataset is aware of the field you are trying to
> use. You can do this by clicking on the Refresh button on the Data tab with
> that dataset selected. I get that same message if I've added or changed a
> field in the underlying database and forget to refresh the dataset.
> Jared
> "Jaime Stuardo" <JaimeStuardo@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:8C285D68-701D-451F-A2A8-363B80874025@.microsoft.com...
> > Hi all..
> >
> > I have a dataset named "Primas" that returns 3 records with 3 fields each.
> >
> > I want to display a list of those records with a header and a summarize
> > row.
> > To do that, I placed a Table control into the layout. Assigned "Primas" as
> > the dataset and I placed a textbox control into it with the value of
> > =Fields!CODIGOPRIMA.value (CODIGOPRIMA belongs to Primas dataset)
> >
> > When I build the report, I get the error:
> > "Expression value of object CODIGOPRIMA reference field CODIGOPRIMA.
> > Report
> > element expressions can only reference a field in actual dataset scope or,
> > if
> > they are inside an aggregate, the specified dataset scope"
> > (I translated the messaege from Spanish, so I'm not sure if it is
> > accurate,
> > but that's the idea).
> >
> > The question.. why I get that message although I have the dataset
> > specified
> > for that table? When I go to a field property inside the table, under
> > expressions, system shows me only the fields from a dataset that is the
> > parent of the table (a List)
> >
> > Any help will be greately appreciated,
> > Thanks
> > Jaime
>
>
I have a dataset named "Primas" that returns 3 records with 3 fields each.
I want to display a list of those records with a header and a summarize row.
To do that, I placed a Table control into the layout. Assigned "Primas" as
the dataset and I placed a textbox control into it with the value of
=Fields!CODIGOPRIMA.value (CODIGOPRIMA belongs to Primas dataset)
When I build the report, I get the error:
"Expression value of object CODIGOPRIMA reference field CODIGOPRIMA. Report
element expressions can only reference a field in actual dataset scope or, if
they are inside an aggregate, the specified dataset scope"
(I translated the messaege from Spanish, so I'm not sure if it is accurate,
but that's the idea).
The question.. why I get that message although I have the dataset specified
for that table? When I go to a field property inside the table, under
expressions, system shows me only the fields from a dataset that is the
parent of the table (a List)
Any help will be greately appreciated,
Thanks
JaimeYou might check that the Dataset is aware of the field you are trying to
use. You can do this by clicking on the Refresh button on the Data tab with
that dataset selected. I get that same message if I've added or changed a
field in the underlying database and forget to refresh the dataset.
Jared
"Jaime Stuardo" <JaimeStuardo@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:8C285D68-701D-451F-A2A8-363B80874025@.microsoft.com...
> Hi all..
> I have a dataset named "Primas" that returns 3 records with 3 fields each.
> I want to display a list of those records with a header and a summarize
> row.
> To do that, I placed a Table control into the layout. Assigned "Primas" as
> the dataset and I placed a textbox control into it with the value of
> =Fields!CODIGOPRIMA.value (CODIGOPRIMA belongs to Primas dataset)
> When I build the report, I get the error:
> "Expression value of object CODIGOPRIMA reference field CODIGOPRIMA.
> Report
> element expressions can only reference a field in actual dataset scope or,
> if
> they are inside an aggregate, the specified dataset scope"
> (I translated the messaege from Spanish, so I'm not sure if it is
> accurate,
> but that's the idea).
> The question.. why I get that message although I have the dataset
> specified
> for that table? When I go to a field property inside the table, under
> expressions, system shows me only the fields from a dataset that is the
> parent of the table (a List)
> Any help will be greately appreciated,
> Thanks
> Jaime|||Hi Tom...
I have done so but the same problem happens. And when I go to the field
value combobox, only dataset fields associated with the List are shown, not
table daaset fields.
Jaime
"Tom Rocco" wrote:
> You might check that the Dataset is aware of the field you are trying to
> use. You can do this by clicking on the Refresh button on the Data tab with
> that dataset selected. I get that same message if I've added or changed a
> field in the underlying database and forget to refresh the dataset.
> Jared
> "Jaime Stuardo" <JaimeStuardo@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:8C285D68-701D-451F-A2A8-363B80874025@.microsoft.com...
> > Hi all..
> >
> > I have a dataset named "Primas" that returns 3 records with 3 fields each.
> >
> > I want to display a list of those records with a header and a summarize
> > row.
> > To do that, I placed a Table control into the layout. Assigned "Primas" as
> > the dataset and I placed a textbox control into it with the value of
> > =Fields!CODIGOPRIMA.value (CODIGOPRIMA belongs to Primas dataset)
> >
> > When I build the report, I get the error:
> > "Expression value of object CODIGOPRIMA reference field CODIGOPRIMA.
> > Report
> > element expressions can only reference a field in actual dataset scope or,
> > if
> > they are inside an aggregate, the specified dataset scope"
> > (I translated the messaege from Spanish, so I'm not sure if it is
> > accurate,
> > but that's the idea).
> >
> > The question.. why I get that message although I have the dataset
> > specified
> > for that table? When I go to a field property inside the table, under
> > expressions, system shows me only the fields from a dataset that is the
> > parent of the table (a List)
> >
> > Any help will be greately appreciated,
> > Thanks
> > Jaime
>
>
How to differentiate SQL 2000 and MSDE installs
Hello!
I am trying to determine how to differentiate a SQL 2000 and MSDE install
without running a query on the database.
In mmc's post and Andrea's answer on 1/18/05, a clear solution using a query
is noted.
I would like to be able to read a registy value to make the determination if
possible.
Thanks very much for the assistance.
Carl
Hi
Gave you installed SQL Server on one machine, MSDE on another one and looked
at the differences?
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Carl Langren" <test@.test> wrote in message
news:eNlceBWBFHA.3588@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hello!
> I am trying to determine how to differentiate a SQL 2000 and MSDE install
> without running a query on the database.
> In mmc's post and Andrea's answer on 1/18/05, a clear solution using a
query
> is noted.
> I would like to be able to read a registy value to make the determination
if
> possible.
> Thanks very much for the assistance.
> Carl
>
|||Hi Mike,
Yes, three servers and six workstations. Mixed MSDE, Developer and Full SQL.
I was really looking more for an answer rather than a question......
I found this post:
http://www.masterado.net/home/ng/for...t14419113.aspx
=================================================
11/16/2004 4:27:03 PM SQL Server 2000 registry values by edition?
Is it possible to determine through the registry which edition of SQL Server
2000 has been installed - Enterprise, Standard, Personal, Developer,
Evalulation, Windows CE, Desktop (MSDE)?
I know it's possible using 'SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('edition')' in
QueryAnalyzer but what about the registry?
Thanks!
==================================================
11/28/2004 4:20:00 AM RE: SQL Server 2000 registry values by edition?
No, but you can use registry key below to differentiate between MSDE and
other sql editions:
For a named instance:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\<Instance
Name>\Setup
For a default instance:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\MSSQLServer\ Setup
If one of these keys exist but there is no ProductCode, the instance is one
of the SQL Server 2000 Editions (such as Enterprise, Enterprise Evaluation,
Standard, Developer, or Personal).
If a ProductCode entry is present, the instance is MSDE.
You can also parse the sql errorlog to determine what edition, see KB: INF:
How to Determine the Download Files You Need for Upgrading to SQL Server
2000 Service Pack 3 - http://support.microsoft.com/?id=814618
Fany Vargas
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Are you secure? For information about the Strategic Technology Protection
Program and to order your FREE Security Tool Kit, please visit
http://www.microsoft.com/security.
Microsoft highly recommends that users with Internet access update their
Microsoft software to better protect against viruses and security
vulnerabilities. The easiest way to do this is to visit the following
websites:
http://www.microsoft.com/protect
http://www.microsoft.com/security/guidance/default.mspx
|||hi Carl,
Carl Langren wrote:
> Hello!
> I am trying to determine how to differentiate a SQL 2000 and MSDE
> install without running a query on the database.
> In mmc's post and Andrea's answer on 1/18/05, a clear solution using
> a query is noted.
> I would like to be able to read a registy value to make the
> determination if possible.
> Thanks very much for the assistance.
> Carl
AFAIK, apart from ProductCode key in the Setup hive you already mentioned,
unfortunately there are no registry difference among SQL Server editions,
and MSDE is one of them, and only directly querying the engine determins a
real answer to this question...
Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
DbaMgr2k ver 0.10.0 - DbaMgr ver 0.56.0
(my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
interface)
-- remove DMO to reply
I am trying to determine how to differentiate a SQL 2000 and MSDE install
without running a query on the database.
In mmc's post and Andrea's answer on 1/18/05, a clear solution using a query
is noted.
I would like to be able to read a registy value to make the determination if
possible.
Thanks very much for the assistance.
Carl
Hi
Gave you installed SQL Server on one machine, MSDE on another one and looked
at the differences?
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"Carl Langren" <test@.test> wrote in message
news:eNlceBWBFHA.3588@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hello!
> I am trying to determine how to differentiate a SQL 2000 and MSDE install
> without running a query on the database.
> In mmc's post and Andrea's answer on 1/18/05, a clear solution using a
query
> is noted.
> I would like to be able to read a registy value to make the determination
if
> possible.
> Thanks very much for the assistance.
> Carl
>
|||Hi Mike,
Yes, three servers and six workstations. Mixed MSDE, Developer and Full SQL.
I was really looking more for an answer rather than a question......
I found this post:
http://www.masterado.net/home/ng/for...t14419113.aspx
=================================================
11/16/2004 4:27:03 PM SQL Server 2000 registry values by edition?
Is it possible to determine through the registry which edition of SQL Server
2000 has been installed - Enterprise, Standard, Personal, Developer,
Evalulation, Windows CE, Desktop (MSDE)?
I know it's possible using 'SELECT SERVERPROPERTY('edition')' in
QueryAnalyzer but what about the registry?
Thanks!
==================================================
11/28/2004 4:20:00 AM RE: SQL Server 2000 registry values by edition?
No, but you can use registry key below to differentiate between MSDE and
other sql editions:
For a named instance:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\<Instance
Name>\Setup
For a default instance:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\MSSQLServer\ Setup
If one of these keys exist but there is no ProductCode, the instance is one
of the SQL Server 2000 Editions (such as Enterprise, Enterprise Evaluation,
Standard, Developer, or Personal).
If a ProductCode entry is present, the instance is MSDE.
You can also parse the sql errorlog to determine what edition, see KB: INF:
How to Determine the Download Files You Need for Upgrading to SQL Server
2000 Service Pack 3 - http://support.microsoft.com/?id=814618
Fany Vargas
Microsoft Corporation
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Are you secure? For information about the Strategic Technology Protection
Program and to order your FREE Security Tool Kit, please visit
http://www.microsoft.com/security.
Microsoft highly recommends that users with Internet access update their
Microsoft software to better protect against viruses and security
vulnerabilities. The easiest way to do this is to visit the following
websites:
http://www.microsoft.com/protect
http://www.microsoft.com/security/guidance/default.mspx
|||hi Carl,
Carl Langren wrote:
> Hello!
> I am trying to determine how to differentiate a SQL 2000 and MSDE
> install without running a query on the database.
> In mmc's post and Andrea's answer on 1/18/05, a clear solution using
> a query is noted.
> I would like to be able to read a registy value to make the
> determination if possible.
> Thanks very much for the assistance.
> Carl
AFAIK, apart from ProductCode key in the Setup hive you already mentioned,
unfortunately there are no registry difference among SQL Server editions,
and MSDE is one of them, and only directly querying the engine determins a
real answer to this question...
Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
DbaMgr2k ver 0.10.0 - DbaMgr ver 0.56.0
(my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
interface)
-- remove DMO to reply
How to differentiate process instances in perfmon
In a multi-instance cluster, how can you match a named sql server instance
with an instance of sqlservr.exe? When setting up counter collection in
perfmon, I choose the "process" performance object, then the "% processor
time" counter". In list of instances, I can see sqlservr#1, sqlservr#2, etc.
How do I know which named instance each of those represents?
TIA.
Hello
One way (I dont know if is the best way) is to match the ProcessID on
Process Counter from Performance Monitor to the ProcessID that is on the
ErrorLog from the Instance.
Something like:
PerfMon -> Process -> ProcessID -> Select SQLServer# on the instances.
Now go to SQL Server Enterprise Manager for each instance and look on the
ErrorLog for the line:
Server Process ID is 3636.
That should be easy if you need to do just on time.
Carlos Eduardo Selonke de Souza
http://carlos.geekbunker.org
"Denise" wrote:
> In a multi-instance cluster, how can you match a named sql server instance
> with an instance of sqlservr.exe? When setting up counter collection in
> perfmon, I choose the "process" performance object, then the "% processor
> time" counter". In list of instances, I can see sqlservr#1, sqlservr#2, etc.
> How do I know which named instance each of those represents?
> TIA.
|||That's a good idea, thanks for the suggestion.
I don't have access to the error log on all the servers, but I can use
SELECT SERVERPROPERTY ('processid')
"Carlos Eduardo Selonke de Souza" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hello
> One way (I dont know if is the best way) is to match the ProcessID on
> Process Counter from Performance Monitor to the ProcessID that is on the
> ErrorLog from the Instance.
> Something like:
> PerfMon -> Process -> ProcessID -> Select SQLServer# on the instances.
> Now go to SQL Server Enterprise Manager for each instance and look on the
> ErrorLog for the line:
> Server Process ID is 3636.
> That should be easy if you need to do just on time.
> --
> Carlos Eduardo Selonke de Souza
> http://carlos.geekbunker.org
>
> "Denise" wrote:
with an instance of sqlservr.exe? When setting up counter collection in
perfmon, I choose the "process" performance object, then the "% processor
time" counter". In list of instances, I can see sqlservr#1, sqlservr#2, etc.
How do I know which named instance each of those represents?
TIA.
Hello
One way (I dont know if is the best way) is to match the ProcessID on
Process Counter from Performance Monitor to the ProcessID that is on the
ErrorLog from the Instance.
Something like:
PerfMon -> Process -> ProcessID -> Select SQLServer# on the instances.
Now go to SQL Server Enterprise Manager for each instance and look on the
ErrorLog for the line:
Server Process ID is 3636.
That should be easy if you need to do just on time.
Carlos Eduardo Selonke de Souza
http://carlos.geekbunker.org
"Denise" wrote:
> In a multi-instance cluster, how can you match a named sql server instance
> with an instance of sqlservr.exe? When setting up counter collection in
> perfmon, I choose the "process" performance object, then the "% processor
> time" counter". In list of instances, I can see sqlservr#1, sqlservr#2, etc.
> How do I know which named instance each of those represents?
> TIA.
|||That's a good idea, thanks for the suggestion.
I don't have access to the error log on all the servers, but I can use
SELECT SERVERPROPERTY ('processid')
"Carlos Eduardo Selonke de Souza" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hello
> One way (I dont know if is the best way) is to match the ProcessID on
> Process Counter from Performance Monitor to the ProcessID that is on the
> ErrorLog from the Instance.
> Something like:
> PerfMon -> Process -> ProcessID -> Select SQLServer# on the instances.
> Now go to SQL Server Enterprise Manager for each instance and look on the
> ErrorLog for the line:
> Server Process ID is 3636.
> That should be easy if you need to do just on time.
> --
> Carlos Eduardo Selonke de Souza
> http://carlos.geekbunker.org
>
> "Denise" wrote:
How to differentiate between an SQL 2000 installation and an MSDE
Hi
Could any one tell me how to diffentiate between a sql instance and an msde
instance
thanks
mmc
hi,
mmc wrote:
> Hi
> Could any one tell me how to diffentiate between a sql instance and
> an msde instance
> thanks
> mmc
SET NOCOUNT ON
SELECT SERVERPROPERTY ( 'Edition' )
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...a-ses_3mi1.asp
it returns "Desktop Engine" for MSDE
Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
DbaMgr2k ver 0.9.1 - DbaMgr ver 0.55.1
(my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
interface)
-- remove DMO to reply
sql
Could any one tell me how to diffentiate between a sql instance and an msde
instance
thanks
mmc
hi,
mmc wrote:
> Hi
> Could any one tell me how to diffentiate between a sql instance and
> an msde instance
> thanks
> mmc
SET NOCOUNT ON
SELECT SERVERPROPERTY ( 'Edition' )
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...a-ses_3mi1.asp
it returns "Desktop Engine" for MSDE
Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
DbaMgr2k ver 0.9.1 - DbaMgr ver 0.55.1
(my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
interface)
-- remove DMO to reply
sql
how to Diff vs Sum in Group By query?
Hello,
if area 'A' contains 2 numbers in 2 rows then
Select area, Sum(number) from tbl1 where area = 'A'
Group By area
gives me the sum of these 2 numbers in area 'A'
But how can I retrieve the difference of these 2 numbers
using T-Sql?
Thanks,
RonRon wrote:
> Hello,
> if area 'A' contains 2 numbers in 2 rows then
> Select area, Sum(number) from tbl1 where area = 'A'
> Group By area
> gives me the sum of these 2 numbers in area 'A'
> But how can I retrieve the difference of these 2 numbers
> using T-Sql?
> Thanks,
> Ron
Max(number) - Min(number)
Bob Barrows
--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.|||Thanks. That is pretty
. I forgot to include a
twist in here. I also have a datefld. So num1 may be min
or num may be max. I have to show +num or -num.
select area, (First(num) - Last(num)) as num1 from tbl1
where datefld between '1/1/2005' and 1/2/2005' Group By
area having area = 'A'
I was able to use your trick to get my positive or
negative result using First and Last functions. Any
suggestions appreciated if this is incorrect usage.
Thanks again,
Ron
>--Original Message--
>Ron wrote:
>Max(number) - Min(number)
>Bob Barrows
>--
>Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
>Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed
in my From
>header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often.
You will get a
>quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.
>
>.
>|||Ron wrote:
> Thanks. That is pretty. I forgot to include a
> twist in here. I also have a datefld. So num1 may be min
> or num may be max. I have to show +num or -num.
> select area, (First(num) - Last(num)) as num1 from tbl1
> where datefld between '1/1/2005' and 1/2/2005' Group By
> area having area = 'A'
> I was able to use your trick to get my positive or
> negative result using First and Last functions. Any
> suggestions appreciated if this is incorrect usage.
First? Last? You must be using Access ... This is a SQL Server group
Do you need a SQL Server (Transact-SQL) solution? Those fnctions do not
exist in T-SQL.
Bob Barrows
--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.|||On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:19:41 -0800, Ron wrote:
>Thanks. That is pretty. I forgot to include a
>twist in here. I also have a datefld. So num1 may be min
>or num may be max. I have to show +num or -num.
>select area, (First(num) - Last(num)) as num1 from tbl1
>where datefld between '1/1/2005' and 1/2/2005' Group By
>area having area = 'A'
>I was able to use your trick to get my positive or
>negative result using First and Last functions. Any
>suggestions appreciated if this is incorrect usage.
Hi Ron,
Try if this helps:
SELECT G.Area, F.num - L.num AS num1
FROM (SELECT area, MIN(datefld) AS FDate, MAX(datefld) AS LDate
FROM tbl1
WHERE datefld BETWEEN '20050101' AND '20050201'
GROUP BY area) AS G
INNER JOIN tbl1 AS F
ON F.area = G.area
AND F.datefld = G.FDate
INNER JOIN tbl1 AS L
ON L.area = G.area
AND L.datefld = G.LDate
WHERE G.area = 'A'
Best, Hugo
--
(Remove _NO_ and _SPAM_ to get my e-mail address)|||SELECT A.area, A.num-B.num
FROM Tbl1 AS A
JOIN Tbl1 AS B
ON A.datefld < B.datefld
AND A.area = 'A'
AND B.area = 'A'
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
--|||Yes, I figured that out. I was writing the sql in Access
and transferring in to Query Analyzer. Sorry bout that.
I did end up creating a udf for first and last.
>--Original Message--
>Ron wrote:
min
>First? Last? You must be using Access ... This is a SQL
Server group
>Do you need a SQL Server (Transact-SQL) solution? Those
fnctions do not
>exist in T-SQL.
>
>Bob Barrows
>--
>Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
>Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed
in my From
>header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often.
You will get a
>quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.
>
>.
>|||Thanks. I will give that a try.
>--Original Message--
>On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:19:41 -0800, Ron wrote:
>
min
>Hi Ron,
>Try if this helps:
>SELECT G.Area, F.num - L.num AS num1
>FROM (SELECT area, MIN(datefld) AS FDate, MAX
(datefld) AS LDate
> FROM tbl1
> WHERE datefld BETWEEN '20050101'
AND '20050201'
> GROUP BY area) AS G
>INNER JOIN tbl1 AS F
> ON F.area = G.area
> AND F.datefld = G.FDate
>INNER JOIN tbl1 AS L
> ON L.area = G.area
> AND L.datefld = G.LDate
>WHERE G.area = 'A'
>
>Best, Hugo
>--
>(Remove _NO_ and _SPAM_ to get my e-mail address)
>.
>|||Thanks very much for your reply. I will give this a try.
>--Original Message--
>SELECT A.area, A.num-B.num
> FROM Tbl1 AS A
> JOIN Tbl1 AS B
> ON A.datefld < B.datefld
> AND A.area = 'A'
> AND B.area = 'A'
>--
>David Portas
>SQL Server MVP
>--
>.
>
if area 'A' contains 2 numbers in 2 rows then
Select area, Sum(number) from tbl1 where area = 'A'
Group By area
gives me the sum of these 2 numbers in area 'A'
But how can I retrieve the difference of these 2 numbers
using T-Sql?
Thanks,
RonRon wrote:
> Hello,
> if area 'A' contains 2 numbers in 2 rows then
> Select area, Sum(number) from tbl1 where area = 'A'
> Group By area
> gives me the sum of these 2 numbers in area 'A'
> But how can I retrieve the difference of these 2 numbers
> using T-Sql?
> Thanks,
> Ron
Max(number) - Min(number)
Bob Barrows
--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.|||Thanks. That is pretty
. I forgot to include atwist in here. I also have a datefld. So num1 may be min
or num may be max. I have to show +num or -num.
select area, (First(num) - Last(num)) as num1 from tbl1
where datefld between '1/1/2005' and 1/2/2005' Group By
area having area = 'A'
I was able to use your trick to get my positive or
negative result using First and Last functions. Any
suggestions appreciated if this is incorrect usage.
Thanks again,
Ron
>--Original Message--
>Ron wrote:
>Max(number) - Min(number)
>Bob Barrows
>--
>Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
>Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed
in my From
>header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often.
You will get a
>quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.
>
>.
>|||Ron wrote:
> Thanks. That is pretty
. I forgot to include a> twist in here. I also have a datefld. So num1 may be min
> or num may be max. I have to show +num or -num.
> select area, (First(num) - Last(num)) as num1 from tbl1
> where datefld between '1/1/2005' and 1/2/2005' Group By
> area having area = 'A'
> I was able to use your trick to get my positive or
> negative result using First and Last functions. Any
> suggestions appreciated if this is incorrect usage.
First? Last? You must be using Access ... This is a SQL Server group
Do you need a SQL Server (Transact-SQL) solution? Those fnctions do not
exist in T-SQL.
Bob Barrows
--
Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed in my From
header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often. You will get a
quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.|||On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:19:41 -0800, Ron wrote:
>Thanks. That is pretty
. I forgot to include a>twist in here. I also have a datefld. So num1 may be min
>or num may be max. I have to show +num or -num.
>select area, (First(num) - Last(num)) as num1 from tbl1
>where datefld between '1/1/2005' and 1/2/2005' Group By
>area having area = 'A'
>I was able to use your trick to get my positive or
>negative result using First and Last functions. Any
>suggestions appreciated if this is incorrect usage.
Hi Ron,
Try if this helps:
SELECT G.Area, F.num - L.num AS num1
FROM (SELECT area, MIN(datefld) AS FDate, MAX(datefld) AS LDate
FROM tbl1
WHERE datefld BETWEEN '20050101' AND '20050201'
GROUP BY area) AS G
INNER JOIN tbl1 AS F
ON F.area = G.area
AND F.datefld = G.FDate
INNER JOIN tbl1 AS L
ON L.area = G.area
AND L.datefld = G.LDate
WHERE G.area = 'A'
Best, Hugo
--
(Remove _NO_ and _SPAM_ to get my e-mail address)|||SELECT A.area, A.num-B.num
FROM Tbl1 AS A
JOIN Tbl1 AS B
ON A.datefld < B.datefld
AND A.area = 'A'
AND B.area = 'A'
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
--|||Yes, I figured that out. I was writing the sql in Access
and transferring in to Query Analyzer. Sorry bout that.
I did end up creating a udf for first and last.
>--Original Message--
>Ron wrote:
min
>First? Last? You must be using Access ... This is a SQL
Server group
>Do you need a SQL Server (Transact-SQL) solution? Those
fnctions do not
>exist in T-SQL.
>
>Bob Barrows
>--
>Microsoft MVP -- ASP/ASP.NET
>Please reply to the newsgroup. The email account listed
in my From
>header is my spam trap, so I don't check it very often.
You will get a
>quicker response by posting to the newsgroup.
>
>.
>|||Thanks. I will give that a try.
>--Original Message--
>On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:19:41 -0800, Ron wrote:
>
min
>Hi Ron,
>Try if this helps:
>SELECT G.Area, F.num - L.num AS num1
>FROM (SELECT area, MIN(datefld) AS FDate, MAX
(datefld) AS LDate
> FROM tbl1
> WHERE datefld BETWEEN '20050101'
AND '20050201'
> GROUP BY area) AS G
>INNER JOIN tbl1 AS F
> ON F.area = G.area
> AND F.datefld = G.FDate
>INNER JOIN tbl1 AS L
> ON L.area = G.area
> AND L.datefld = G.LDate
>WHERE G.area = 'A'
>
>Best, Hugo
>--
>(Remove _NO_ and _SPAM_ to get my e-mail address)
>.
>|||Thanks very much for your reply. I will give this a try.
>--Original Message--
>SELECT A.area, A.num-B.num
> FROM Tbl1 AS A
> JOIN Tbl1 AS B
> ON A.datefld < B.datefld
> AND A.area = 'A'
> AND B.area = 'A'
>--
>David Portas
>SQL Server MVP
>--
>.
>
how to diff the data of same table of two sql servers
as subject.
any freeware or done at sql level?
thanks!What?
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>|||say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
"ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>|||It's not free but it's real cheap. www.red-gate.com has a product called
data compare that will do what you ask.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:%23tl6F6FzEHA.1596@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
> i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
> "ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
> news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>|||I'm with Andrew, I vote Red Gate
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>|||"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>
What about using a FULL OUTER JOIN and then pulling the values with NULL.
Those would be the difference records. The matches would be the matching
records.
Rick Sawtell
MCT, MCSD, MCDBA|||Have a look at www.dbghost.com - why bother with a product that doesn't
always work?
DB Ghost? provides you with a fully automated BUILD, COMPARISON and
SYNCHRONIZATION capability for your SQL Server databases and is the only
product on the market that ensures database integrity as DB Ghost? will bu
ild
your database directly from your source control system. No other product in
the world does this. No other product can build, compare and synchronize a
target database making it match the source scripts precisely, every single
time, not just sometimes, but every single time. Try and prove us wrong.
Something else that might grab your interest is that an incredible 94% of
our clients (94%!!!) previously purchased our competitors products and soon
found that in the real world, these products let them down time after time.
Don't make the same mistake - why would you buy from our competitors who, fo
r
similar money, can only offer you tools that don't build, and only compare
and sometimes synchronize...food for thought?
"ChrisR" wrote:
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
>
any freeware or done at sql level?
thanks!What?
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>|||say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
"ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>|||It's not free but it's real cheap. www.red-gate.com has a product called
data compare that will do what you ask.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:%23tl6F6FzEHA.1596@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
> i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
> "ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
> news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>|||I'm with Andrew, I vote Red Gate
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>|||"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>
What about using a FULL OUTER JOIN and then pulling the values with NULL.
Those would be the difference records. The matches would be the matching
records.
Rick Sawtell
MCT, MCSD, MCDBA|||Have a look at www.dbghost.com - why bother with a product that doesn't
always work?
DB Ghost? provides you with a fully automated BUILD, COMPARISON and
SYNCHRONIZATION capability for your SQL Server databases and is the only
product on the market that ensures database integrity as DB Ghost? will bu
ild
your database directly from your source control system. No other product in
the world does this. No other product can build, compare and synchronize a
target database making it match the source scripts precisely, every single
time, not just sometimes, but every single time. Try and prove us wrong.
Something else that might grab your interest is that an incredible 94% of
our clients (94%!!!) previously purchased our competitors products and soon
found that in the real world, these products let them down time after time.
Don't make the same mistake - why would you buy from our competitors who, fo
r
similar money, can only offer you tools that don't build, and only compare
and sometimes synchronize...food for thought?
"ChrisR" wrote:
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
>
how to diff the data of same table of two sql servers
as subject.
any freeware or done at sql level?
thanks!What?
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>|||say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
"ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > as subject.
> >
> > any freeware or done at sql level?
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> >
>|||It's not free but it's real cheap. www.red-gate.com has a product called
data compare that will do what you ask.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:%23tl6F6FzEHA.1596@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
> i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
> "ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
> news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> What?
>>
>> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
>> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> > as subject.
>> >
>> > any freeware or done at sql level?
>> >
>> > thanks!
>> >
>> >
>>
>|||I'm with Andrew, I vote Red Gate
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>|||"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>
What about using a FULL OUTER JOIN and then pulling the values with NULL.
Those would be the difference records. The matches would be the matching
records.
Rick Sawtell
MCT, MCSD, MCDBA|||Have a look at www.dbghost.com - why bother with a product that doesn't
always work?
DB Ghostâ?¢ provides you with a fully automated BUILD, COMPARISON and
SYNCHRONIZATION capability for your SQL Server databases and is the only
product on the market that ensures database integrity as DB Ghostâ?¢ will build
your database directly from your source control system. No other product in
the world does this. No other product can build, compare and synchronize a
target database making it match the source scripts precisely, every single
time, not just sometimes, but every single time. Try and prove us wrong.
Something else that might grab your interest is that an incredible 94% of
our clients (94%!!!) previously purchased our competitors products and soon
found that in the real world, these products let them down time after time.
Don't make the same mistake - why would you buy from our competitors who, for
similar money, can only offer you tools that don't build, and only compare
and sometimes synchronize...food for thought?
"ChrisR" wrote:
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > as subject.
> >
> > any freeware or done at sql level?
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> >
>
>
any freeware or done at sql level?
thanks!What?
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>|||say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
"ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > as subject.
> >
> > any freeware or done at sql level?
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> >
>|||It's not free but it's real cheap. www.red-gate.com has a product called
data compare that will do what you ask.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:%23tl6F6FzEHA.1596@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
> i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
> "ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
> news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> What?
>>
>> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
>> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> > as subject.
>> >
>> > any freeware or done at sql level?
>> >
>> > thanks!
>> >
>> >
>>
>|||I'm with Andrew, I vote Red Gate
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>|||"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>
What about using a FULL OUTER JOIN and then pulling the values with NULL.
Those would be the difference records. The matches would be the matching
records.
Rick Sawtell
MCT, MCSD, MCDBA|||Have a look at www.dbghost.com - why bother with a product that doesn't
always work?
DB Ghostâ?¢ provides you with a fully automated BUILD, COMPARISON and
SYNCHRONIZATION capability for your SQL Server databases and is the only
product on the market that ensures database integrity as DB Ghostâ?¢ will build
your database directly from your source control system. No other product in
the world does this. No other product can build, compare and synchronize a
target database making it match the source scripts precisely, every single
time, not just sometimes, but every single time. Try and prove us wrong.
Something else that might grab your interest is that an incredible 94% of
our clients (94%!!!) previously purchased our competitors products and soon
found that in the real world, these products let them down time after time.
Don't make the same mistake - why would you buy from our competitors who, for
similar money, can only offer you tools that don't build, and only compare
and sometimes synchronize...food for thought?
"ChrisR" wrote:
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > as subject.
> >
> > any freeware or done at sql level?
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> >
>
>
how to diff the data of same table of two sql servers
as subject.
any freeware or done at sql level?
thanks!
What?
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>
|||say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
"ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
|||It's not free but it's real cheap. www.red-gate.com has a product called
data compare that will do what you ask.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:%23tl6F6FzEHA.1596@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
> i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
> "ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
> news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>
|||I'm with Andrew, I vote Red Gate
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>
|||"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>
What about using a FULL OUTER JOIN and then pulling the values with NULL.
Those would be the difference records. The matches would be the matching
records.
Rick Sawtell
MCT, MCSD, MCDBA
|||Have a look at www.dbghost.com - why bother with a product that doesn't
always work?
DB Ghost? provides you with a fully automated BUILD, COMPARISON and
SYNCHRONIZATION capability for your SQL Server databases and is the only
product on the market that ensures database integrity as DB Ghost? will build
your database directly from your source control system. No other product in
the world does this. No other product can build, compare and synchronize a
target database making it match the source scripts precisely, every single
time, not just sometimes, but every single time. Try and prove us wrong.
Something else that might grab your interest is that an incredible 94% of
our clients (94%!!!) previously purchased our competitors products and soon
found that in the real world, these products let them down time after time.
Don't make the same mistake - why would you buy from our competitors who, for
similar money, can only offer you tools that don't build, and only compare
and sometimes synchronize...food for thought?
"ChrisR" wrote:
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
>
any freeware or done at sql level?
thanks!
What?
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>
|||say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
"ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
|||It's not free but it's real cheap. www.red-gate.com has a product called
data compare that will do what you ask.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:%23tl6F6FzEHA.1596@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> say, i have a table Order at server A and B,
> i want to diff the sql data at two servers.
> "ChrisR" <chris@.noemail.com> wrote in message
> news:OgXnH3FzEHA.1188@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>
|||I'm with Andrew, I vote Red Gate
Wayne Snyder, MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
www.mariner-usa.com
(Please respond only to the newsgroups.)
I support the Professional Association of SQL Server (PASS) and it's
community of SQL Server professionals.
www.sqlpass.org
"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>
|||"Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> as subject.
> any freeware or done at sql level?
> thanks!
>
What about using a FULL OUTER JOIN and then pulling the values with NULL.
Those would be the difference records. The matches would be the matching
records.
Rick Sawtell
MCT, MCSD, MCDBA
|||Have a look at www.dbghost.com - why bother with a product that doesn't
always work?
DB Ghost? provides you with a fully automated BUILD, COMPARISON and
SYNCHRONIZATION capability for your SQL Server databases and is the only
product on the market that ensures database integrity as DB Ghost? will build
your database directly from your source control system. No other product in
the world does this. No other product can build, compare and synchronize a
target database making it match the source scripts precisely, every single
time, not just sometimes, but every single time. Try and prove us wrong.
Something else that might grab your interest is that an incredible 94% of
our clients (94%!!!) previously purchased our competitors products and soon
found that in the real world, these products let them down time after time.
Don't make the same mistake - why would you buy from our competitors who, for
similar money, can only offer you tools that don't build, and only compare
and sometimes synchronize...food for thought?
"ChrisR" wrote:
> What?
>
> "Mullin Yu" <mullin_yu@.ctil.com> wrote in message
> news:OREXwwFzEHA.1264@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
>
how to diaplay date in MM/dd/yyyy format
how to display date in mm/dd/yy using select query ( i have dates which are in mm/dd/yyyyy format but when i run a query it displaying yyyy-mm-dd format).i want to display date in mm/dd/yyyy format so how to write select query for that
This 'should' work:
SELECT convert( varchar(10), MyColumn, 101 )
For example, using today's date:
SELECT convert( varchar(10), getdate(), 101 )
-
05/25/2007
It the style number which indicates how the system should transform your data.
Here is more detail.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187928.aspx
|||thanks a lot MVPsqlhow to diagnostic performance issue?
Hi,
I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how to
identify the cause.
its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
I'm using SQL 2005.
during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
000rows/sec!
so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes its
really bad. (for the same process & queries)
I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA at
2Gbps
if I track the performance counters...
Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
the CPU is 25% of usage
sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
loaded!!!
doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the big
table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
CXPacket waitstate.
loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up to
8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical memory,
but virtual memory is 9Gb)
what can I do to diagnose the problem?
Thanks
Jerome.Jeje wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how to
> identify the cause.
> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
> I'm using SQL 2005.
> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
> 000rows/sec!
> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes its
> really bad. (for the same process & queries)
> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA at
> 2Gbps
> if I track the performance counters...
> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
> the CPU is 25% of usage
> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
> loaded!!!
> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the big
> table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
> CXPacket waitstate.
> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up to
> 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical memory,
> but virtual memory is 9Gb)
> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
> Thanks
> Jerome.
>
Do you have the proper indexes in place to support the queries you're
running? You might also look into using MAXDOP, the wait type of
CXPACKET indicates parallel processes that are waiting on siblings to
catch up.
Tracy McKibben
MCDBA
http://www.realsqlguy.com|||the maxdop option reduce the cxpacket size numbers, but the query is a
little slower.
I have 1 index which cover all the columns used in the joins + 1 index on
each linked table.
all the joins except 1 are simple = on 1 column only.
there is no clustered indexes on these columns.
and I can't create or use them.
also... I see a high % disk time (up to 800%)
"Tracy McKibben" <tracy@.realsqlguy.com> wrote in message
news:eh$Y2aesGHA.3556@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Jeje wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how
>> to identify the cause.
>> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
>> I'm using SQL 2005.
>> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
>> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
>> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
>> 000rows/sec!
>> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes
>> its really bad. (for the same process & queries)
>> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA
>> at 2Gbps
>> if I track the performance counters...
>> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
>> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
>> the CPU is 25% of usage
>> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows
>> are loaded!!!
>> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
>> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
>> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
>> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the
>> big table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
>> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot
>> of CXPacket waitstate.
>> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
>> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up
>> to 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical
>> memory, but virtual memory is 9Gb)
>> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
>> Thanks
>> Jerome.
>>
> Do you have the proper indexes in place to support the queries you're
> running? You might also look into using MAXDOP, the wait type of CXPACKET
> indicates parallel processes that are waiting on siblings to catch up.
>
> --
> Tracy McKibben
> MCDBA
> http://www.realsqlguy.com|||Hi
Have you done AWE /PAE to configure the memory?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/
"Jeje" <willgart@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23rk%238mdsGHA.1888@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how
> to identify the cause.
> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
> I'm using SQL 2005.
> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
> 000rows/sec!
> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes
> its really bad. (for the same process & queries)
> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA
> at 2Gbps
> if I track the performance counters...
> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
> the CPU is 25% of usage
> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
> loaded!!!
> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the
> big table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
> CXPacket waitstate.
> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up
> to 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical
> memory, but virtual memory is 9Gb)
> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
> Thanks
> Jerome.
>|||no, not required
its x64bits server (win 2003 ent x64 and SQL Server 2005x64 enterprise)
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:%23bygttfsGHA.148@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> Have you done AWE /PAE to configure the memory?
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/
>
>
>
> "Jeje" <willgart@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23rk%238mdsGHA.1888@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Hi,
>> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how
>> to identify the cause.
>> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
>> I'm using SQL 2005.
>> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
>> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
>> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
>> 000rows/sec!
>> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes
>> its really bad. (for the same process & queries)
>> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA
>> at 2Gbps
>> if I track the performance counters...
>> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
>> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
>> the CPU is 25% of usage
>> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows
>> are loaded!!!
>> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
>> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
>> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
>> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the
>> big table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
>> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot
>> of CXPacket waitstate.
>> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
>> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up
>> to 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical
>> memory, but virtual memory is 9Gb)
>> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
>> Thanks
>> Jerome.
>>
>
I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how to
identify the cause.
its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
I'm using SQL 2005.
during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
000rows/sec!
so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes its
really bad. (for the same process & queries)
I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA at
2Gbps
if I track the performance counters...
Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
the CPU is 25% of usage
sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
loaded!!!
doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the big
table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
CXPacket waitstate.
loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up to
8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical memory,
but virtual memory is 9Gb)
what can I do to diagnose the problem?
Thanks
Jerome.Jeje wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how to
> identify the cause.
> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
> I'm using SQL 2005.
> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
> 000rows/sec!
> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes its
> really bad. (for the same process & queries)
> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA at
> 2Gbps
> if I track the performance counters...
> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
> the CPU is 25% of usage
> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
> loaded!!!
> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the big
> table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
> CXPacket waitstate.
> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up to
> 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical memory,
> but virtual memory is 9Gb)
> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
> Thanks
> Jerome.
>
Do you have the proper indexes in place to support the queries you're
running? You might also look into using MAXDOP, the wait type of
CXPACKET indicates parallel processes that are waiting on siblings to
catch up.
Tracy McKibben
MCDBA
http://www.realsqlguy.com|||the maxdop option reduce the cxpacket size numbers, but the query is a
little slower.
I have 1 index which cover all the columns used in the joins + 1 index on
each linked table.
all the joins except 1 are simple = on 1 column only.
there is no clustered indexes on these columns.
and I can't create or use them.
also... I see a high % disk time (up to 800%)
"Tracy McKibben" <tracy@.realsqlguy.com> wrote in message
news:eh$Y2aesGHA.3556@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Jeje wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how
>> to identify the cause.
>> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
>> I'm using SQL 2005.
>> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
>> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
>> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
>> 000rows/sec!
>> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes
>> its really bad. (for the same process & queries)
>> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA
>> at 2Gbps
>> if I track the performance counters...
>> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
>> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
>> the CPU is 25% of usage
>> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows
>> are loaded!!!
>> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
>> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
>> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
>> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the
>> big table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
>> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot
>> of CXPacket waitstate.
>> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
>> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up
>> to 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical
>> memory, but virtual memory is 9Gb)
>> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
>> Thanks
>> Jerome.
>>
> Do you have the proper indexes in place to support the queries you're
> running? You might also look into using MAXDOP, the wait type of CXPACKET
> indicates parallel processes that are waiting on siblings to catch up.
>
> --
> Tracy McKibben
> MCDBA
> http://www.realsqlguy.com|||Hi
Have you done AWE /PAE to configure the memory?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/
"Jeje" <willgart@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23rk%238mdsGHA.1888@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how
> to identify the cause.
> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
> I'm using SQL 2005.
> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
> 000rows/sec!
> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes
> its really bad. (for the same process & queries)
> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA
> at 2Gbps
> if I track the performance counters...
> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
> the CPU is 25% of usage
> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
> loaded!!!
> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the
> big table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
> CXPacket waitstate.
> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up
> to 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical
> memory, but virtual memory is 9Gb)
> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
> Thanks
> Jerome.
>|||no, not required
its x64bits server (win 2003 ent x64 and SQL Server 2005x64 enterprise)
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:%23bygttfsGHA.148@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> Have you done AWE /PAE to configure the memory?
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/
>
>
>
> "Jeje" <willgart@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23rk%238mdsGHA.1888@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>> Hi,
>> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how
>> to identify the cause.
>> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
>> I'm using SQL 2005.
>> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
>> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
>> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
>> 000rows/sec!
>> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes
>> its really bad. (for the same process & queries)
>> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA
>> at 2Gbps
>> if I track the performance counters...
>> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
>> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
>> the CPU is 25% of usage
>> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows
>> are loaded!!!
>> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
>> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
>> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
>> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the
>> big table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
>> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot
>> of CXPacket waitstate.
>> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
>> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up
>> to 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical
>> memory, but virtual memory is 9Gb)
>> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
>> Thanks
>> Jerome.
>>
>
how to diagnostic performance issue?
Hi,
I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how to
identify the cause.
its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
I'm using SQL 2005.
during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
000rows/sec!
so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes its
really bad. (for the same process & queries)
I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA at
2Gbps
if I track the performance counters...
Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
the CPU is 25% of usage
sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
loaded!!!
doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the big
table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
CXPacket waitstate.
loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up to
8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical memory,
but virtual memory is 9Gb)
what can I do to diagnose the problem?
Thanks
Jerome.Jeje wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how
to
> identify the cause.
> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
> I'm using SQL 2005.
> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
> 000rows/sec!
> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes i
ts
> really bad. (for the same process & queries)
> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA a
t
> 2Gbps
> if I track the performance counters...
> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
> the CPU is 25% of usage
> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
> loaded!!!
> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the b
ig
> table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
> CXPacket waitstate.
> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up
to
> 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical memory,
> but virtual memory is 9Gb)
> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
> Thanks
> Jerome.
>
Do you have the proper indexes in place to support the queries you're
running? You might also look into using MAXDOP, the wait type of
CXPACKET indicates parallel processes that are waiting on siblings to
catch up.
Tracy McKibben
MCDBA
http://www.realsqlguy.com|||the maxdop option reduce the cxpacket size numbers, but the query is a
little slower.
I have 1 index which cover all the columns used in the joins + 1 index on
each linked table.
all the joins except 1 are simple = on 1 column only.
there is no clustered indexes on these columns.
and I can't create or use them.
also... I see a high % disk time (up to 800%)
"Tracy McKibben" <tracy@.realsqlguy.com> wrote in message
news:eh$Y2aesGHA.3556@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Jeje wrote:
> Do you have the proper indexes in place to support the queries you're
> running? You might also look into using MAXDOP, the wait type of CXPACKET
> indicates parallel processes that are waiting on siblings to catch up.
>
> --
> Tracy McKibben
> MCDBA
> http://www.realsqlguy.com|||Hi
Have you done AWE /PAE to configure the memory?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/
"Jeje" <willgart@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23rk%238mdsGHA.1888@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how
> to identify the cause.
> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
> I'm using SQL 2005.
> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
> 000rows/sec!
> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes
> its really bad. (for the same process & queries)
> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA
> at 2Gbps
> if I track the performance counters...
> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
> the CPU is 25% of usage
> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
> loaded!!!
> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the
> big table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
> CXPacket waitstate.
> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up
> to 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical
> memory, but virtual memory is 9Gb)
> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
> Thanks
> Jerome.
>|||no, not required
its x64bits server (win 2003 ent x64 and SQL Server 2005x64 enterprise)
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:%23bygttfsGHA.148@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> Have you done AWE /PAE to configure the memory?
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/
>
>
>
> "Jeje" <willgart@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23rk%238mdsGHA.1888@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how to
identify the cause.
its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
I'm using SQL 2005.
during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
000rows/sec!
so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes its
really bad. (for the same process & queries)
I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA at
2Gbps
if I track the performance counters...
Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
the CPU is 25% of usage
sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
loaded!!!
doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the big
table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
CXPacket waitstate.
loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up to
8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical memory,
but virtual memory is 9Gb)
what can I do to diagnose the problem?
Thanks
Jerome.Jeje wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how
to
> identify the cause.
> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
> I'm using SQL 2005.
> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
> 000rows/sec!
> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes i
ts
> really bad. (for the same process & queries)
> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA a
t
> 2Gbps
> if I track the performance counters...
> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
> the CPU is 25% of usage
> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
> loaded!!!
> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the b
ig
> table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
> CXPacket waitstate.
> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up
to
> 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical memory,
> but virtual memory is 9Gb)
> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
> Thanks
> Jerome.
>
Do you have the proper indexes in place to support the queries you're
running? You might also look into using MAXDOP, the wait type of
CXPACKET indicates parallel processes that are waiting on siblings to
catch up.
Tracy McKibben
MCDBA
http://www.realsqlguy.com|||the maxdop option reduce the cxpacket size numbers, but the query is a
little slower.
I have 1 index which cover all the columns used in the joins + 1 index on
each linked table.
all the joins except 1 are simple = on 1 column only.
there is no clustered indexes on these columns.
and I can't create or use them.
also... I see a high % disk time (up to 800%)
"Tracy McKibben" <tracy@.realsqlguy.com> wrote in message
news:eh$Y2aesGHA.3556@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Jeje wrote:
> Do you have the proper indexes in place to support the queries you're
> running? You might also look into using MAXDOP, the wait type of CXPACKET
> indicates parallel processes that are waiting on siblings to catch up.
>
> --
> Tracy McKibben
> MCDBA
> http://www.realsqlguy.com|||Hi
Have you done AWE /PAE to configure the memory?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/
"Jeje" <willgart@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23rk%238mdsGHA.1888@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> I have a server with performance issue and I want to know why or know how
> to identify the cause.
> its for a datawarehouse SQL database.
> I'm using SQL 2005.
> during loading process or during query against the largest table (40
> millions of rows), the server provide a bad response time.
> when I load this table the performance could be 150 000rows/sec or 10
> 000rows/sec!
> so I try to find why sometimes the performance is average, and sometimes
> its really bad. (for the same process & queries)
> I have 16Gb of Ram, 2 * Opteron dual core CPUs and a SAN with only 1 HBA
> at 2Gbps
> if I track the performance counters...
> Sometimes I see a high pages/sec value (4000-6000)
> sometimes its the Avg disk queue length value
> the CPU is 25% of usage
> sometimes the server become unresponsive or is responseive but no rows are
> loaded!!!
> doing the same process of a smaller table and on a smaller dev server
> provide a far better throughput (200 000 rows/sec; near no stops in the
> process; perf. counter are constant values etc...)
> when a execute a query which is a simple group by (without joins) on the
> big table, the server takes 3 to 4 minutes to answer.
> using joins the same group by query takes 10 minutes and there is a lot of
> CXPacket waitstate.
> loading these 40 millions of rows can takes 20 minutes or 1hour...
> If I take a look at the memory usage, the server starts to use memory (up
> to 8Gb) and sudenly release the memory (go down to 200Mb of physical
> memory, but virtual memory is 9Gb)
> what can I do to diagnose the problem?
> Thanks
> Jerome.
>|||no, not required
its x64bits server (win 2003 ent x64 and SQL Server 2005x64 enterprise)
"Uri Dimant" <urid@.iscar.co.il> wrote in message
news:%23bygttfsGHA.148@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> Have you done AWE /PAE to configure the memory?
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/
>
>
>
> "Jeje" <willgart@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23rk%238mdsGHA.1888@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
How to diagnose memory bloating?
Good morning/afternoon,
We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and would
like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I did
add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
Where do we go from here?eg1,
By storage, do you mean memoy as in your subject line? Check the SQL Server
logand Windows event log to see if there are any messages that might offer a
hint. Check to see if your paging file is filling up (use Performance
Monitor or Task Manager).
The two instances might be fighting each other for memory resources. If all
else fails, try limiting the memory for each instance to 700 MB (or maybe a
little less). SQL Server is an aggressive user of system memory.
-- Bill
"eg1" <Bor@.kurzikstan.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98BA9DAEAED0BBorkurzikstancom@.20
7.46.248.16...
> Good morning/afternoon,
> We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
> running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
> each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
> Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and
> would
> like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
> know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I
> did
> add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
> Where do we go from here?
We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and would
like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I did
add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
Where do we go from here?eg1,
By storage, do you mean memoy as in your subject line? Check the SQL Server
logand Windows event log to see if there are any messages that might offer a
hint. Check to see if your paging file is filling up (use Performance
Monitor or Task Manager).
The two instances might be fighting each other for memory resources. If all
else fails, try limiting the memory for each instance to 700 MB (or maybe a
little less). SQL Server is an aggressive user of system memory.
-- Bill
"eg1" <Bor@.kurzikstan.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98BA9DAEAED0BBorkurzikstancom@.20
7.46.248.16...
> Good morning/afternoon,
> We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
> running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
> each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
> Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and
> would
> like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
> know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I
> did
> add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
> Where do we go from here?
How to diagnose memory bloating?
Good morning/afternoon,
We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and would
like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I did
add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
Where do we go from here?eg1,
By storage, do you mean memoy as in your subject line? Check the SQL Server
logand Windows event log to see if there are any messages that might offer a
hint. Check to see if your paging file is filling up (use Performance
Monitor or Task Manager).
The two instances might be fighting each other for memory resources. If all
else fails, try limiting the memory for each instance to 700 MB (or maybe a
little less). SQL Server is an aggressive user of system memory.
-- Bill
"eg1" <Bor@.kurzikstan.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98BA9DAEAED0BBorkurzikstancom@.207.46.248.16...
> Good morning/afternoon,
> We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
> running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
> each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
> Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and
> would
> like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
> know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I
> did
> add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
> Where do we go from here?
We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and would
like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I did
add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
Where do we go from here?eg1,
By storage, do you mean memoy as in your subject line? Check the SQL Server
logand Windows event log to see if there are any messages that might offer a
hint. Check to see if your paging file is filling up (use Performance
Monitor or Task Manager).
The two instances might be fighting each other for memory resources. If all
else fails, try limiting the memory for each instance to 700 MB (or maybe a
little less). SQL Server is an aggressive user of system memory.
-- Bill
"eg1" <Bor@.kurzikstan.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98BA9DAEAED0BBorkurzikstancom@.207.46.248.16...
> Good morning/afternoon,
> We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
> running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
> each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
> Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and
> would
> like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
> know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I
> did
> add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
> Where do we go from here?
How to diagnose memory bloating?
Good morning/afternoon,
We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and would
like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I did
add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
Where do we go from here?
eg1,
By storage, do you mean memoy as in your subject line? Check the SQL Server
logand Windows event log to see if there are any messages that might offer a
hint. Check to see if your paging file is filling up (use Performance
Monitor or Task Manager).
The two instances might be fighting each other for memory resources. If all
else fails, try limiting the memory for each instance to 700 MB (or maybe a
little less). SQL Server is an aggressive user of system memory.
-- Bill
"eg1" <Bor@.kurzikstan.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98BA9DAEAED0BBorkurzikstancom@.207.46.248.1 6...
> Good morning/afternoon,
> We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
> running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
> each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
> Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and
> would
> like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
> know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I
> did
> add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
> Where do we go from here?
sql
We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and would
like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I did
add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
Where do we go from here?
eg1,
By storage, do you mean memoy as in your subject line? Check the SQL Server
logand Windows event log to see if there are any messages that might offer a
hint. Check to see if your paging file is filling up (use Performance
Monitor or Task Manager).
The two instances might be fighting each other for memory resources. If all
else fails, try limiting the memory for each instance to 700 MB (or maybe a
little less). SQL Server is an aggressive user of system memory.
-- Bill
"eg1" <Bor@.kurzikstan.com> wrote in message
news:Xns98BA9DAEAED0BBorkurzikstancom@.207.46.248.1 6...
> Good morning/afternoon,
> We have two instances of sql-server 2k running. They start out fine
> running about 50-100 meg of storage, then gradually increase to over 750mg
> each, then one of the other stops responding and needs a restart.
> Though I'm an old hand at database systems, I'm new to SQL-server and
> would
> like to find a way to resolve this. I've run a couple of traces, but not
> know what parameters to set, haven't really found a problem. (Though I
> did
> add a couple of indexes which sped the system up.)
> Where do we go from here?
sql
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)